The Digital Millennium Copyright Act , passed in 1998 , is a fundamental piece of legislating which forms the foundation of US legal philosophy regarding digital rights . It ’s far from consummate for consumers — but it also has a massive impact on the forward motion of enquiry , too .
https://gizmodo.com/everything-wrong-with-digital-copyright-and-how-to-fix-5989166
slating hasa fascinating pieceon the topic , write by computer protection investigator Edward Felten . It does a wonderful jobof shedding light on the way large corporations endeavor to use the DMCA to unattackable - arm research worker into censoring their inquiry :
Back in 2001 , my colleagues and I had had to withdraw a peer - review paper about standard candle written matter protection , because the Recording Industry Association of America and others were threaten legal action , arrogate that our paper was a “ circumvention engineering ” in ravishment of another part of the DMCA .
[ I]t indicate that the DMCA had become a go - to scheme for companies facing embarrassing revelation about their product … The inquiry community saw this trouble coming and repeatedly asked Congress to amend the bill that would become the DMCA , to create an effective safe haven for research . There was a letter to Congress from 50 security researcher ( include me ) , another from the head of major scientific societies , and a third from the pass professional society for computer scientists . But with so much at post in the human activity for so many major interests , our voice was n’t heard .
It ’s a reminder that , while it ’s easy to be outraged by busted policy when it get to the digital rights of consumers , there ’s plenty , plenty more to worry about in the deluxe schema of things . Goread the whole articleto regain out more . [ Slate ]
security measures
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and finish news in your inbox daily .
News from the future tense , delivered to your present tense .
You May Also Like
